Abstract

Objective: Fourth-generation human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen/antibody assays reduce the diagnostic window; however, reactive results necessitate further evaluation. The objective of this study was to characterize the distribution of samples across the stages of HIV screening and confirmatory testing in a high-volume tertiary-care laboratory and to identify confirmed HIV infections.

Methods: This retrospective descriptive study analyzed 286,425 unique serum samples from patients aged 18 years or older, collected between May 2024 and January 2026. Initial screening was conducted using fourth-generation HIV antigen/antibody assays on the Atellica IM or ADVIA Centaur systems. Samples demonstrating repeated reactivity underwent further testing with the VIDAS HIV Duo Quick assay. VIDAS-reactive samples were referred to a reference laboratory for supplemental serological testing. HIV-1 RNA testing was performed using the NeuMoDx platform through June 2025 and the ELITe BeGenius platform from July 2025 onward. Data analyses were descriptive.

Results: Among the 286,425 patient samples, 4480 tested repeated reactivity on the initial screening platforms (1.56%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52%–1.61%). Of these, 1378 samples (30.76%) remained reactive on VIDAS, while 3102 (69.24%) were VIDAS-nonreactive and did not undergo HIV-1 RNA testing or reference laboratory confirmation. HIV infection was confirmed in 188 of the 1378 referred samples (13.64%; 95% CI, 11.87%–15.57%), including 100 newly diagnosed cases and 88 with a prior HIV diagnosis. Final results for the remaining 1190 samples were unavailable. In total, 5050 HIV-1 RNA tests were performed during the study period.

Conclusion: Discordant reactivity was identified between the initial screening platforms and VIDAS. This discordance may be attributable to low pretest probability, variations in antigen/antibody capture designs and analytical thresholds, or nonspecific reactivity. Due to the absence of verification data for VIDAS-nonreactive samples and VIDAS-reactive samples without final results, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values could not be determined.

Volume 39, Issue 3 Volume 39, Issue 2 Volume 39, Isssue 1 Volume 38, Issue 4 Volume 38, Issue 3 Volume 38, Issue 2 Volume 38, Issue 1 Volume 37, Issue 4 Volume 37, Issue 3 Volume 37, Issue 2 Volume 37, Issue 1 Volume 36, Issue 4 Volume 36, Supplement 1 Volume 36, Issue 3 Volume 36, Issue 2 Volume 36, Issue 1 Volume 35, Issue 4 Volume 35, Issue 3 Volume 35, Issue 2 Volume 35, Issue 1 Volume 34, Issue 3 Volume 34, Issue 2 Volume 34, Issue 1 Volume 33, Issue 3 Volume 33, Issue 2 Volume 33, Issue 1 Volume 32, Issue 3 Volume 32, Supplement 1 Volume 32, Supplement 2 Volume 32, Issue 2 Volume 32, Issue 1 Volume 31, Issue 3 Volume 31, Issue 2 Volume 31, Supplement 1 Volume 31, Issue 1 Volume 30, Issue 3 Volume 30, Issue 2 Volume 30, Supplement 1 Volume 30, Issue 1 Volume 29, Issue 3 Volume 29, Issue 2 Volume 29, Issue 1 Volume 28, Supplement 1 Volume 28, Issue 3 Volume 28, Issue 2 Volume 28, Issue 1 Volume 27, Supplement 1 Volume 27, Issue 3 Volume 27, Issue 2 Volume 27, Issue 1 Volume 26, Issue 3 Volume 26, Supplement 1 Volume 26, Issue 2 Volume 26, Issue 1 Volume 25, Issue 3 Volume 25, Issue 2 Volume 25, Issue 1 Volume 24, Issue 3 Volume 24, Issue 2 Volume 24, Issue 1 Volume 23, Issue 3 Volume 23, Issue 2 Volume 23, Issue 1 Volume 22, Issue 3 Volume 22, Issue 2 Volume 22, Issue 1 Volume 21, Issue 3 Volume 21, Supplement 2 Volume 21, Supplement 1 Volume 21, Issue 2 Volume 21, Issue 1 Volume 20, Issue 3 Volume 20, Supplement 2 Volume 20, Issue 2 Volume 20, Issue 1 Volume 20, Supplement 1 Volume 19, Issue 3 Volume 19, Issue 2 Volume 19, Issue 1 Volume 18, Issue 3 Volume 18, Supplement 1 Volume 18, Issue 2 Volume 18, Issue 1 Volume 17, Issue 3 Volume 17, Issue 2 Volume 17, Issue 1 Volume 16, Issue 3 Volume 16, Issue 2 Volume 16, Issue 1 Volume 1, Supplement 1 Volume 15, Issue 3 Volume 15, Issue 2 Volume 15, Issue 1 Volume 14, Issue 3 Volume 14, Issue 2 Volume 14, Issue 1 Volume 13, Issue 3 Volume 13, Issue 2 Volume 13, Supplement 1 Volume 13, Issue 1 Volume 12, Issue 3 Volume 12, Issue 2 Volume 12, Issue 1 Volume 11, Issue 3 Volume 11, Issue 2 Volume 11, Supplement 1 Volume 11, Issue 1 Volume 10, Issue 3 Volume 10, Issue 2 Volume 10, Issue 1 Volume 9, Issue 3 Volume 9, Issue 2 Volume 9, Issue 1 Volume 8, Issue 3 Volume 8, Issue 2 Volume 8, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 3 Volume 7, Issue 1 Volume 7, Issue 2 Volume 7, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 3 Volume 5, Issue 1 Volume 5, Issue 2 Volume 5, Issue 3 Volume 6, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 1 Volume 3, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 1 Volume 4, Issue 2 Volume 1, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 1 Volume 2, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 3 Volume 1, Issue 1