Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to identify subspecies of Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) isolates from clinical samples by a molecular technique and to determine mutations responsible for macrolide and aminoglycoside resistance. We also aimed to investigate the correlation of phenotypic and molecular test results by examining the resistance to antimicrobial agents according to CLSI standard using the liquid microdilution test.

Methods: 27 MABC isolates from clinical samples were examined. Molecular subspecies identification and mutations responsible for aminoglycoside (rrs mutation) and macrolide resistance (rrl mutation) were determined using the GenoType NTM-DR test. The resistance phenotypes of the strains to various antimicrobial agents were investigated by the Sensititre™ RAPMYCOI AST microdilution test.

Results: Of the 27 isolates tested, 21 were M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, three were M. abscessus subsp. bolletii, and three were M. abscessus subsp. massilienserrs and rrl mutations were not observed in any strains. Except for one isolate, all M. abscessus subsp. abscessus strains showed the erm(41) T28 genotype, which indicates inducible macrolide resistance. The correlation between the GenoType NTM-DR and phenotypic susceptibility test results was 81% (k=0.5, p=0.02) for inducible macrolide resistance and 89% for acquired macrolide resistance. The most effective antimicrobial agents were amikacin, cefoxitin, imipenem, linezolid, and tigecycline.

Conclusion: Although the GenoType NTM-DR test is reliable in identifying and detecting molecular macrolide and aminoglycoside resistance, there were discrepancies in the results. We recommend confirming the results with the phenotypic susceptibility method after growth on culture. Although the M. abscessus complex is resistant to many antimicrobial agents, it has shown high sensitivity to amikacin, cefoxitin, imipenem, linezolid, and tigecycline. High levels of inducible macrolide resistance in isolates indicate the importance of subtyping and sensitivity testing of isolates in patients where culture conversion has not been achieved.

Hasta Onamı
Veriler retrospektif olarak incelendiği için hasta onamı alınmamıştır.

Etik Kurul Kararı
Çalışma için, Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Etik Kurulu tarafından 07 Temmuz 2021 tarih ve 20.478.486 karar numarasıyla onay alınmıştır.

Danışman Değerlendirmesi
Bağımsız dış danışman

Yazar Katkıları
Fikir/Kavram – S.S., N.Ö.; Tasarım – S.S., N.Ö.; Denetleme – S.S.; Kaynak ve Fon Sağlama – S.S., H.G., C.Ç.; Malzemeler/Hastalar – S.S., H.G., C.Ç.; Veri Toplama ve/veya İşleme – S.S., N.Ö.; Analiz ve/veya Yorum – S.S., N.Ö., H.G., C.Ç.; Literatür Taraması – S.S., H.G.; Makale Yazımı – S.S.; Eleştirel İnceleme – S.S., N.Ö., C.Ç.

Çıkar Çatışması
Yazarlar herhangi bir çıkar çatışması bildirmemiştir.

Finansal Destek
Araştırma Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi tarafından 2021-084 proje numarasıyla desteklenmiştir.

Volume 37, Issue 1 Volume 36, Issue 4 Volume 36, Supplement 1 Volume 36, Issue 3 Volume 36, Issue 2 Volume 36, Issue 1 Volume 35, Issue 4 Volume 35, Issue 3 Volume 35, Issue 2 Volume 35, Issue 1 Volume 34, Issue 3 Volume 34, Issue 2 Volume 34, Issue 1 Volume 33, Issue 3 Volume 33, Issue 2 Volume 33, Issue 1 Volume 32, Issue 3 Volume 32, Supplement 1 Volume 32, Supplement 2 Volume 32, Issue 2 Volume 32, Issue 1 Volume 31, Issue 3 Volume 31, Issue 2 Volume 31, Supplement 1 Volume 31, Issue 1 Volume 30, Issue 3 Volume 30, Issue 2 Volume 30, Supplement 1 Volume 30, Issue 1 Volume 29, Issue 3 Volume 29, Issue 2 Volume 29, Issue 1 Volume 28, Supplement 1 Volume 28, Issue 3 Volume 28, Issue 2 Volume 28, Issue 1 Volume 27, Supplement 1 Volume 27, Issue 3 Volume 27, Issue 2 Volume 27, Issue 1 Volume 26, Issue 3 Volume 26, Supplement 1 Volume 26, Issue 2 Volume 26, Issue 1 Volume 25, Issue 3 Volume 25, Issue 2 Volume 25, Issue 1 Volume 24, Issue 3 Volume 24, Issue 2 Volume 24, Issue 1 Volume 23, Issue 3 Volume 23, Issue 2 Volume 23, Issue 1 Volume 22, Issue 3 Volume 22, Issue 2 Volume 22, Issue 1 Volume 21, Issue 3 Volume 21, Supplement 2 Volume 21, Supplement 1 Volume 21, Issue 2 Volume 21, Issue 1 Volume 20, Issue 3 Volume 20, Supplement 2 Volume 20, Issue 2 Volume 20, Issue 1 Volume 20, Supplement 1 Volume 19, Issue 3 Volume 19, Issue 2 Volume 19, Issue 1 Volume 18, Issue 3 Volume 18, Supplement 1 Volume 18, Issue 2 Volume 18, Issue 1 Volume 17, Issue 3 Volume 17, Issue 2 Volume 17, Issue 1 Volume 16, Issue 3 Volume 16, Issue 2 Volume 16, Issue 1 Volume 1, Supplement 1 Volume 15, Issue 3 Volume 15, Issue 2 Volume 15, Issue 1 Volume 14, Issue 3 Volume 14, Issue 2 Volume 14, Issue 1 Volume 13, Issue 3 Volume 13, Issue 2 Volume 13, Supplement 1 Volume 13, Issue 1 Volume 12, Issue 3 Volume 12, Issue 2 Volume 12, Issue 1 Volume 11, Issue 3 Volume 11, Issue 2 Volume 11, Supplement 1 Volume 11, Issue 1 Volume 10, Issue 3 Volume 10, Issue 2 Volume 10, Issue 1 Volume 9, Issue 3 Volume 9, Issue 2 Volume 9, Issue 1 Volume 8, Issue 3 Volume 8, Issue 2 Volume 8, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 3 Volume 7, Issue 1 Volume 7, Issue 2 Volume 7, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 3 Volume 5, Issue 1 Volume 5, Issue 2 Volume 5, Issue 3 Volume 6, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 1 Volume 3, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 1 Volume 4, Issue 2 Volume 1, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 1 Volume 2, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 3 Volume 1, Issue 1