Most Read

  1. Pneumococcal Vaccine as One of the Immunization Coverage Targets for Adulthood Vaccines: A Consensus Report of the Study Group for Adult Immunization of the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
  2. HIV Infection in Turkey: How Close Are We to the Target?
  3. Evaluation of HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Who Had Undergone Liver Biopsy in Accordance With the Guidelines
  4. Does Hepatitis B Affect Erectile Dysfunction and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms?
  5. Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Diabetic Foot Wounds and Infections: Turkish Consensus Report
  6. When to Stop Antiviral Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B
  7. Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum: Their Role in Urogenital System Infections and Retrospective Evaluation of Antibiotic Resistance Rates
  8. Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever: Treatment and Use of Ribavirin
  9. Modern Diagnostic Methods Used in Bacteriology: Rapid and Effective
  10. A Case of Generalized Tetanus With a Short Incubation Period
  11. Does Anti-HIV Positivity in Pregnancy Suggest the Requirement of HIV Prophylaxis for Newborn?
  12. Analysis of HIV/AIDS-Related Stigma and Discrimination in Turkey: Results of the People Living With HIV Stigma Index
  13. Potato Dextrose Agar With Rose-Bengal and Chloramphenicol: A New Culture Medium to Isolate Pathogenic Exophiala dermatitidis From the Environment

Volume 36, Issue 1

Original Article

Examination Findings of Type 2 Diabetes Patients’ Feet with and without Ulcers

Şahizer Eraydın
Affiliations
  • Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Esasları Anabilim Dalı, Tokat, Türkiye
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2948-9677
  • diabetic foot examination
  • Diabetic foot infection
  • diabetic foot ulcer
  • diyabetik ayak muayenesi
  • diyabetik ayak ülseri
  • type 2 diabetes mellitus

Abstract

Objective: We conducted this study to determine the factors that cause foot ulcers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with or without diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).

Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive study compared the feet examination results of 43 Type 2 DM patients with or without DFU. The study data were collected using a patient identification form and a diabetic foot examination form. Data are presented as percent, mean, and standard deviation. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for statistical analysis. The statistical significance level was taken as p<0.05.

Results: Of the patients, 63% were male, 79% were married, their mean age was 63.16±9.43, and the mean diabetes year was 18.44±7.77. 74% of the patients had a previous DFU. Of the existing DFU, 58% were on the right foot, 49% were on the toes, 49% were Wagner grade 2, and 37% were infected. There was edema and warmth in the DFU foot (p<0.05). DFU foot had a weaker sense of touch and vibration than the other. Ankle-Brakial Index was below 0.9. Foot pulses were weak, and there were deformities.

Conclusion: Patients with DFU feet have an increased risk of recurrent ulcer formation. These patients should be followed periodically and educated about ulcer formation and signs and symptoms of infection.

  • 58-64
  • Şahizer Eraydın
  • [email protected]
  • 10.36519/kd.2023.4166
  • January 3, 2022
  • November 13, 2022
  • March 21, 2023

  •  Eraydın Ş. [Examination findings of type 2 diabetes patients’ feet with and without ulcers]. Klimik Derg. 2023;36(1):58-64. Turkish..
  • 440
  • 119
Download as PDF
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. CC BY-NC
Volume 37, Issue 1 Volume 36, Issue 4 Volume 36, Supplement 1 Volume 36, Issue 3 Volume 36, Issue 2 Volume 36, Issue 1 Volume 35, Issue 4 Volume 35, Issue 3 Volume 35, Issue 2 Volume 35, Issue 1 Volume 34, Issue 3 Volume 34, Issue 2 Volume 34, Issue 1 Volume 33, Issue 3 Volume 33, Issue 2 Volume 33, Issue 1 Volume 32, Issue 3 Volume 32, Supplement 1 Volume 32, Supplement 2 Volume 32, Issue 2 Volume 32, Issue 1 Volume 31, Issue 3 Volume 31, Issue 2 Volume 31, Supplement 1 Volume 31, Issue 1 Volume 30, Issue 3 Volume 30, Issue 2 Volume 30, Supplement 1 Volume 30, Issue 1 Volume 29, Issue 3 Volume 29, Issue 2 Volume 29, Issue 1 Volume 28, Supplement 1 Volume 28, Issue 3 Volume 28, Issue 2 Volume 28, Issue 1 Volume 27, Supplement 1 Volume 27, Issue 3 Volume 27, Issue 2 Volume 27, Issue 1 Volume 26, Issue 3 Volume 26, Supplement 1 Volume 26, Issue 2 Volume 26, Issue 1 Volume 25, Issue 3 Volume 25, Issue 2 Volume 25, Issue 1 Volume 24, Issue 3 Volume 24, Issue 2 Volume 24, Issue 1 Volume 23, Issue 3 Volume 23, Issue 2 Volume 23, Issue 1 Volume 22, Issue 3 Volume 22, Issue 2 Volume 22, Issue 1 Volume 21, Issue 3 Volume 21, Supplement 2 Volume 21, Supplement 1 Volume 21, Issue 2 Volume 21, Issue 1 Volume 20, Issue 3 Volume 20, Supplement 2 Volume 20, Issue 2 Volume 20, Issue 1 Volume 20, Supplement 1 Volume 19, Issue 3 Volume 19, Issue 2 Volume 19, Issue 1 Volume 18, Issue 3 Volume 18, Supplement 1 Volume 18, Issue 2 Volume 18, Issue 1 Volume 17, Issue 3 Volume 17, Issue 2 Volume 17, Issue 1 Volume 16, Issue 3 Volume 16, Issue 2 Volume 16, Issue 1 Volume 1, Supplement 1 Volume 15, Issue 3 Volume 15, Issue 2 Volume 15, Issue 1 Volume 14, Issue 3 Volume 14, Issue 2 Volume 14, Issue 1 Volume 13, Issue 3 Volume 13, Issue 2 Volume 13, Supplement 1 Volume 13, Issue 1 Volume 12, Issue 3 Volume 12, Issue 2 Volume 12, Issue 1 Volume 11, Issue 3 Volume 11, Issue 2 Volume 11, Supplement 1 Volume 11, Issue 1 Volume 10, Issue 3 Volume 10, Issue 2 Volume 10, Issue 1 Volume 9, Issue 3 Volume 9, Issue 2 Volume 9, Issue 1 Volume 8, Issue 3 Volume 8, Issue 2 Volume 8, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 3 Volume 7, Issue 1 Volume 7, Issue 2 Volume 7, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 3 Volume 5, Issue 1 Volume 5, Issue 2 Volume 5, Issue 3 Volume 6, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 1 Volume 3, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 1 Volume 4, Issue 2 Volume 1, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 1 Volume 2, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 3 Volume 1, Issue 1